ROIC has diminished a specific degree. It’s partly because of aggressive marketplace dynamics, partly on account of the desire to move public at earnings scale, and partially because of an ability to raise larger amounts of capital.

The age after 2006 and throughout the 2008 financial crisis was a time to raise capital. It had been tougher. You needed to do. Since the quantity of capital has increased, so has the median amount. It’s tripled because 2010 to more than $300M from about $92m.
Photo from Denys Nevozhai on Unsplash

The chart above upgrades that investigation. As a reminder, the bars represent the ROIC for 4 year buckets starting at the year. Startups going public from 2006-2009 revealed a median ROIC of 0.42. 1 venture dollar bought forty-two cents. In 2010, one venture dollar purchased $1.24 of revenue at IPO.

The median earnings at IPO has increased to $200m in 2018-2019 from $55m in 2006. That’s really a jump! At least 2 more years of surgery, likely years, which implies something like $75m-$150m more in opex.
And that’s borne out in the data. SaaS companies go public after.
None of these tendencies is a negative implication. The figures emphasize the changing market dynamics made by an 11 year bull market in applications and the ability of startups to experiment more, hire more to grow as quickly as possible; that will be the most appealing thing to investors in now ’s market.

At IPO, in other words , how much earnings per VC dollar did the company generate. In 2014 we found efficiencies with the years, which was fascinating because it reaffirmed the efficacy of SaaS go-to-market.

There are a few reasons for this. First.

If we examine the ROIC around IPOs across the previous 12 years or so, we see that same initial dynamic of exceptionally efficient businesses in the 2010 and 2014 IPO cohorts. However, the efficiency is declining, markedly.

It’s been five decades and time to see how things have shifted. From the analysis, I made a metric, the return on invested capital (ROIC). ROIC is the number of revenue dollars that one venture dollar purchased.
With more funds, startups can take more risk, research more customer acquisition stations (some that may not work), develop more products and potentially grow quicker. Along with the market and bigger checks at valuations that were larger have fulfilled the need repeatedly,.