So AT&T’s move though it seems this could backfire, is probably more of a marketing push to make individuals aware of the changes that are coming. Some clients may think they have 5G, so why do they need to upgrade to a 5G apparatus when the 5G network arrives, while others may be upset at being given the impression they have access whenever they absolutely do not.
Either way, should you’re on AT&T, you’re probably not going to gain access to real 5G speeds on phones which will connect to 5G networks anytime soon–and be forewarned that when you do, it’s not going to be cheap.
Should you’re in the united states and utilize AT&T as your network operator, you may have noticed a tiny change near the surface of your mobile phone.

AT&T plans to roll out something closer to the 5G capacities we’ve been promised, which it’s rather confusingly calling “5G+,” in 12 US cities at the end of 2019. But even if its system were up and operating, there aren’t lots of 5G-enabled devices to use on that network yet. Samsung’s 5G phone, the huge Galaxy S10 5G, is reportedly launching in May; LG, Huawei, OnePlus, and ZTE are anticipated to get devices at the second half of the year; and Motorola includes a $200 add-on to the Moto Z3 that turns it into an extremely thick 5G phone (thus much with restricted uses).

In its documentation on how it intends to roll out a 5G network, AT&T says that “5Gᴇ” stands for “5G Evolution” and confirms that 5Gᴇ runs on the company’s “existing LTE network. ” While updates should allow more visitors to flow via the network (theoretically raising the data levels potential on the LTE network), speed tests Quartz has carried out around New York harbor ’t revealed results that are even as quickly as that the US national average for LTE networks, let alone 5G.