I would however recommend that you spend a little bit more now to prevent buyer’s remorse. The Paperwhite is a device that is superb and not much more if you re eager to take Amazon’s “unique offers. ” Kindles in general have great build quality. Should you aren’t connected to the Kindle manufacturer, however, the Kobo Clara HD is simply a bit more cash and provides a much better reading experience than either, in my view, in addition to the versatility that accompanies the company’s apparatus.

I ’ ll endorse it when the Kindle gets a screen that matches the entry-level contest, but for today I have to recommend its peers to get a bulge in quality.

It s difficult to catch the gap between the two except in macro shots, but in person it s a severe one. There’s a motive phones, tablets, and e-readers (including Amazon’s own) all went into high pixel density and never looked back.

The Clara also includes a frontlight which lets you correct the colour cast from cool to heat, which you may see above (I understand the temperatures of the images themselves are distinct too but you get the idea). I didn’t think I’d find this useful, but as with resolution, it’s one of those things where once you’ve got it, it s difficult to go back. The pixelated screen of this Kindle was excruciating after the hot expression of this Kobo.
The most basic current device in the e-paper stereo lineup, the plain old “Kindle” (as opposed to Kindle Voyage, Kindle Paperwhite, etc) has in this 2019 iteration gained a few attributes. A flexible frontlight illuminates the E-Ink display, there s a refreshed hardware design and an improved touchscreen, though you ’ re offended should you don ’ t detect.

What you do sacrifice is something far more significant: a good screen.

The specs speak for themselves: the “all-new” Kindle has a density of 167 PPI. The Clara HD believe me, and has nearly twice that: 300 PPI, such as the nicer Kindles, you notice. It makes a big difference to how text appears — there are decreasing returns past that point, but the change from 167 to 300 is a big one. Letters look cuter and more regular, and fonts seem much different from one another, letting you customize your reading experience. (I recently discovered I could easily add fonts to the Kobo and it’s great.)
We’ve been blessed to observe the quality of screens improve both concerning resolution and light. A few months ago I analyzed the $130 Kobo Clara HD, that offers few frills and, frankly, poor build quality, however a gorgeous display and color temperature-adjustable frontlight, which is actually worth paying for.
If you have to have a Kindle reader and may ’ t invest more than $100, I ’ d seriously advise you to attempt to find an old creation of Paperwhite or the like together with frontlight and the higher resolution display. It makes a massive difference and that’s actually the most significant part a reader.

It runs the familiar Kindle OS and of course seamlessly links to your Amazon accounts, just like others from the lineup. In general it’s less or more the same as others in terms of store formats and access attributes, and so on. So you’re not sacrificing anything on that front.
Amazon’s Kindle is obviously the brand most consider when they consider purchasing an e-reader, but competition does exist and the fact is that it makes the company’s newest entry-level device resemble a bad deal. This budget reader doesn ’ t match the bar, although the cost might be reduced.